Does Trump’s Second Act Accelerate Gaza’s Collapse? (Part 3 of 5)


Gaza is more than a warzone—it is a humanitarian catastrophe unraveling in real-time. As homes are reduced to rubble, families are buried in mass graves, and hospitals run out of basic supplies, the world is witnessing what many describe as the slow death of a civilian population. But the suffering in Gaza isn’t just the result of bombs and bullets. It is also the consequence of policy choices—particularly those made by the United States under Donald Trump’s renewed leadership.

In this third installment of our 5-part series, we move beyond airstrikes and ceasefires to examine the deeper, slower-burning war: the war on survival. How has Trump’s second-term stance on international aid, humanitarian agencies, and global institutions intensified Gaza’s collapse? What happens when politics dictate who deserves to live?


Even before the most recent escalation, Gaza was in crisis. With a population of over 2.1 million people crammed into a 141-square-mile strip under Israeli blockade since 2007, Gaza’s economy and public services were already fragile. Electricity came in 3–4 hour bursts. Water was largely undrinkable. Over 80% of the population depended on humanitarian aid just to eat.

Gaza’s hospitals, which once functioned through chronic shortages, have now been decimated—many targeted directly in airstrikes or left non-operational due to lack of fuel and medical supplies.


The humanitarian collapse cannot be separated from international aid policies—and no nation plays a bigger role than the United States.

Under Trump’s first term, the U.S. slashed funding to key agencies that kept Palestinians alive, most notably:

The rationale? The Trump administration claimed UNRWA was “corrupt” and that aid had been misused. But to those on the ground, the cuts meant that children stopped going to school, families lost food support, and patients died waiting for basic care.


In early 2025, reports emerged of children in Gaza dying from malnutrition and dehydration—a horrifying consequence of restricted aid access and deliberate obstruction of food shipments. Satellite imagery and on-the-ground footage show bread lines stretching blocks, people boiling grass for soup, and parents skipping meals so their children might eat.

Aid convoys attempting to reach northern Gaza have been repeatedly bombed or turned back. A senior U.N. official described the situation bluntly: “We are witnessing the weaponization of starvation.”

Yet no statements of condemnation have been issued. No conditions have been placed on continued U.S. military aid to Israel. This silence has consequences—measured in bloated bellies, failing hearts, and the hollow eyes of Gaza’s forgotten millions.


One of the most chilling developments under Trump’s second term is the systematic dismantling of trust in the global aid system. The administration has continued to:

  • Withhold funds from the World Health Organization (WHO) and UN agencies active in Gaza.

These actions don’t just starve Gaza—they intimidate and isolate those who would intervene to help.

In March 2025, an Israeli airstrike killed 15 Palestinian medics and first responders in Rafah. Global outrage followed. But the Trump administration said nothing. When reporters asked whether the U.S. would reevaluate aid policy in light of the attacks, a senior official simply responded, “Israel must be allowed to finish the job.”


Gaza’s collapse is not only physical—it is psychological. For Palestinians, especially children, the trauma of war is compounded by a deep, existential despair: no one is coming to help.

Children in Gaza now grow up not only under drones and rubble, but in a world where human dignity is conditional—and their lives have failed to meet the criteria.


The Trump administration’s unapologetic support of Israel—no matter the humanitarian cost—has reverberated far beyond the Middle East.

And across Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, civil society groups are asking a dangerous question: If the U.S. can ignore the starvation of Gaza, who else can they abandon?

America’s moral leadership, once imperfect but aspirational, is now viewed by many as irreparably compromised.


Many of the organizations trying to deliver aid in Gaza are faith-based—Christian, Muslim, and Jewish groups working quietly to save lives. But under Trump’s return, these groups face new hurdles.

This dangerous politicization of compassion divides the very faiths that could be working together to heal the wounds of war.


It’s easy to forget, amid the political analysis and military reports, that this crisis is about people:

These are not “collateral damage.” These are not “strategic consequences.” These are souls—and they are being abandoned in plain sight.


Gaza’s collapse is not accidental. It is not collateral. It is not simply the cost of war. It is the outcome of deliberate political choices—choices that have prioritized power over people, loyalty over legality, and silence over humanity.

The cost is not just paid by Gaza. It is paid by the moral fabric of the world.

Part 4: From Abraham Accords to Abandonment — The Death of the Two-State Dream